×
To share and enhance best practice management of CML, experts and interested clinicians can discuss difficult or interesting CML cases here. Physicians submit a brief history of the patient and the case for discussion (no more than 200 words) by posting it in this forum ("New Discussion" button below). Please include the country of origin.
Each clinical case will be forwarded to the expert clinical panel for a brief independent response. Consideration should be given to patient confidentiality. Details that are not critical to the case can be changed to preserve anonymity. Please consider including your email with the case. This will not be posted on the website, but is useful should further details be requested by the moderator.
As a full clinical history is necessary for accurate comment, cases and comments on the Forum are ONLY ACCEPTED FROM PHYSICIANS. If individual patients have a specific question we encourage them to contact their healthcare provider. General questions can be emailed to info@cml-foundation.org.
DISCLAIMER: The iCMLf does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, or opinions, and disclaims any representation, warranty, or guaranty as to the same. Reliance on any information provided in this Forum is solely at your own risk.
78 yo male with chronic phase CML diagnosed in 2005. Treated with imatinib 400mg daily since then. Considering cessation because of some side-effects (diarrhoea, anaemia). His BCR-ABL levels are as below, basically 0 for the last 2 years apart from the 0.001 level at last assessment in October 2014. Is the small blip at 0.001 of concern or is a trial of cessation still reasonable?
Cessation is a very reasonable option. Take a look at the Mahon presentation from the latest ASH on the EUROSKI study where 0.01 (MR4) was the target for stopping. Results look very good with a threshold for restarting being 0.1 or loss of MMR. If the results are valid by IS and you are able to do monthly monitoring at least for the first year and at least 2-3 monthly for the next couple, so that you can restart if necessary, go ahead. Of course, participation on a stopping study if possible is always preferred.
The critical issue is that he has had 10 years of imatinib. These are the patients who are most likely to benefit from a trial of cessation. The odd very low positive signal doesn’t seem to matter much according to the French A-STIM study. However you would like to see that the positive result is not the start of a trend. I would repeat and if the level is back to zero I would go ahead with a trial of cessation. If the next PCR result is positive I would probably continue imatinib and keep watching closely and stop once you get a zero reading again – unless the need to cease based on toxicity is compelling in which case I would give it a go anyway.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.View our Privacy Policy