×
To share and enhance best practice management of CML, experts and interested clinicians can discuss difficult or interesting CML cases here. Physicians submit a brief history of the patient and the case for discussion (no more than 200 words) by posting it in this forum ("New Discussion" button below). Please include the country of origin.
Each clinical case will be forwarded to the expert clinical panel for a brief independent response. Consideration should be given to patient confidentiality. Details that are not critical to the case can be changed to preserve anonymity. Please consider including your email with the case. This will not be posted on the website, but is useful should further details be requested by the moderator.
As a full clinical history is necessary for accurate comment, cases and comments on the Forum are ONLY ACCEPTED FROM PHYSICIANS. If individual patients have a specific question we encourage them to contact their healthcare provider. General questions can be emailed to info@cml-foundation.org.
DISCLAIMER: The iCMLf does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, or opinions, and disclaims any representation, warranty, or guaranty as to the same. Reliance on any information provided in this Forum is solely at your own risk.
A 62-year-old female patient has been using ponatinib 15 mg for 7 years due to T315I mutation. I have been following her for 5 years in the case of Complete Molecular Response. However, in the last year, the patient has developed hypertensive attacks, stent placement due to carotid artery stenosis, and finally peripheral neuropathy at CTC 2. The patient complains that her quality of life has deteriorated. My question to you is; should I consider switching to asciminib treatment in this patient or should I stop ponatinib treatment for TFR and perform close molecular follow-up. Or should I consider Allogeneic transplantation in a patient with Complete Molecular Response? Thank you in advance for your suggestions. Best regards.
For the patient described below, I would recommend switching to Asciminib 200mg PO BID. Although it is tempting to try TFR, that is not something we typically recommend for patients with T315I on ponatinib. I don’t think the patient needs to proceed to transplant. I think that Asciminib should be a great option.
This is a very tough and uncommon clinical case. I cannot remember the article about TFR in T315I-mutation patients, they are in a high-risk group, which would be non-safety and challenging in this situation.
In my opinion, the first option is the de-escalation of Ponatinib to 10 mg due to cardiovascular problems with close monitoring of BCR::ABL.
The second option is switching to Asciminib. The allo-HSCT in this clinical case would be the last option as a reserve.
I would also switch to asciminib but would consider a TFR attempt first as a possibility, there are some data of sucessful TFR with ponatinib, although in patients with T315I the experience is limited. doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-187230
We had a very similar situation some years ago in a woman in her 70s. She had originally been in PACE, and after several years on ponatinib she developed PAOD. She had been molecularly undetectable for a couple of years. We had no alternative but to stop treatment. She is now in her 80s, fit and well, off treatment since 2017
It would be entirely reasonable to stop, continue molecular monitoring and introduce asciminib if there is evidence of recurrence
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.View our Privacy Policy